Realms

amazon.com

James H. McMillan: Understanding and Evaluating Educational Research (2nd Edition)

What's New?

Link Mania

Index: Research Design

Logic Model Bibliography

Page Contents

A B C D E F G H I J L M O P R S T U W Y

A

Administration on Children Youth and Families (1995). The program manager's guide to evaluation. Washington, DC, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families.

Alexandria, VA, United Way of America.

Alter, C. and M. Egan (1997). "Logic modeling: a tool for teaching critical thinking in social work practice." Journal of Social Work Education 33(1).

Alter, C. and S. Murty (1997). "Logic modeling: a tool for teaching practice evaluation." Journal of Social Work Education 33(1).

American Cancer Society (1998). Stating outcomes for American Cancer Society programs: a handbook for volunteers and staff. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society.

American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.•Logic Model Bibliography — Page 9 Sartorius, R. (1996). "The thrird generation logical framework." Eurpoean Journal of Agricultural Extension(March).

American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.oLogic Model Bibliography — Page 9 Sartorius, R. (1996). "The thrird generation logical framework." Eurpoean Journal of Agricultural Extension(March).

B

Barley, Z. A., C. Phillips, et al. (1998). Decoding the theory from program materials. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Barley, Z., C. Phillips, et al. (1998). Decoding the theory from program materials. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL Bell, J., J. McLaughlin, et al. (1998). Measuring program outcomes: does it change anything? American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Bell, J., J. McLaughlin, et al. (1998). Measuring program outcomes: does it change anything? American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Brock, T. (1998). Overview of the evaluation of the community partnerships for cultural participation initiative. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

C

Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications.

Chen, H. T. and P. Rossi (1983). "Evaluating with sense: the theory-driven approach." Evaluation Review 7(3): 283-302.

Coffman, J. (1998). Building evaluation capacity: what does it mean and what is our role? American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Coffman, J. (1999). Learning from logic models: an example of a family/school partnership program. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Family Research Project.

Collins, J., D. Rugg, et al. (1996). "Evaluating a national program of school-based HIV prevention." Evaluation and Program Planning 19(3): 209-218.

Connell, J. and A. Kubisch (1996). Applying a theories of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: progress, prospects, and problems. New York, NY,•Logic Model Bibliography — Page 2 Aspin Institute, Roundtable on Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families.

Connell, J. and A. Kubisch (1996). Applying a theories of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: progress, prospects, and problems. New York, NY, Aspin Institute, Roundtable on Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families.

Connell, J. and A. Kubisch (1996). Applying a theories of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: progress, prospects, and problems. New York, NY,oLogic Model Bibliography — Page 2 Aspin Institute, Roundtable on Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families.

Corbeil, R. (1986). Logic on logic models. Evaluation newsletter. Ottawa, Office of the Comptroller General of Canada. September.

D

Dwyer, J. (1996). "Applying program logic model in program planning and evaluation." Public Health and Epidemiology Report Ontario 7(2): 38-46.

E

Edwards, D. E. (1995). "A community approach for Native American drug and alcohol prevention programs: a logic model framework." Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly 13(2): 43- 62.

F

Framst, G. (1995). "Application of program logic model to agricultural technology transfer programs." Canadian Journal of Program Evalaution 10: 123-132.

Francis, K. (1998). Understanding your theory and strategy in order to develop practical and useful outcomes and indicators. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Francis, K. A. (1998). Understanding your theory and strategy in order to develop practical and useful outcomes and indicators. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Freddolino, P. (1998). Michigan safe and drug-free schools and communities: evaluation training workshop, phase 1. Okemos, MI, Michigan Public Health Institute.

Freddolino, P. (1998). Michigan safe and drug-free schools and communities: evaluation training workshop, phase 2. Okemos, MI, Michigan Public Health Institute.•Logic Model Bibliography — Page 8 Freddolino, P., M. Naegeli, et al. (1998). It's a great idea, but....Barriers to the use of program logic models in the real world of program activities. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Freddolino, P. (1998). Michigan safe and drug-free schools and communities: evaluation training workshop, phase 2. Okemos, MI, Michigan Public Health Institute.oLogic Model Bibliography — Page 8 Freddolino, P., M. Naegeli, et al. (1998). It's a great idea, but....Barriers to the use of program logic models in the real world of program activities. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Freddolino, P. P., M. Naegeli, et al. (1998). It's a great idea, but....Barriers to the use of program logic models in the real world of program activities. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Funnell, S. (1997). "Program logic: an adaptable tool for designing and evaluating programs." Evaluation News and Comment 6(1): 5-12.

G

Gill, S. J., R. A. Millett, et al. (1998). Program logic model: a tool for evaluating social change. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Gill, S., R. Millett, et al. (1998). Program logic model: a tool for evaluating social change.

Goodman, R. M., F. C. Wheeler, et al. (1995). "Evaluation of the Heart to Heart project: lessons from a community-based chronic disease prevention project." American Journal of Health Promotion 9(6): 443-455.

H

Handbook of applied social research methods. L. Bickman and D. J. Rog. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications: 229-260.•Logic Model Bibliography — Page 7 American Cancer Society (1998). Stating outcomes for American Cancer Society programs: a handbook for volunteers and staff. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society.

Handbook of applied social research methods. L. Bickman and D. J. Rog. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications: 229-260.oLogic Model Bibliography — Page 7 American Cancer Society (1998). Stating outcomes for American Cancer Society programs: a handbook for volunteers and staff. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society.

Hatary, H., van Houten, T., Plantz, M.C. and Greenway, M.T. Measuring Program Outcomes: A Practical Approach. Alexandria, VA: United Way of America, 1996. Order from 703/212-6300 (in US: 800/772-0008).

Hatry, H.P. Performance Measurement: Getting Results. Washington DC: The Urban Institute Press, 1999. Order from 202/261-5687 or 877/UIPRESS.

Hermann, J. (1996). Using logic models to strengthen service program development: an example of antipoverty programs for at-risk youth. Sociological Practice Association Annual Meeting, Arlington, VA.

Hermann, J. (1997). Using logic models to analyze multisite qualitative data. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.

Hermann, J. A. (1996). Using logic models to strengthen service program development: an example of antipoverty programs for at-risk youth. Sociological Practice Association Annual Meeting, Arlington, VA.•Logic Model Bibliography — Page 3 Hermann, J. A. (1997). Using logic models to analyze multisite qualitative data. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.

Hermann, J. A. (1996). Using logic models to strengthen service program development: an example of antipoverty programs for at-risk youth. Sociological Practice Association Annual Meeting, Arlington, VA.oLogic Model Bibliography — Page 3 Hermann, J. A. (1997). Using logic models to analyze multisite qualitative data. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.

I

Ince, R. (1994). "DIY evaluation and program logic." Evaluation Journal of Australasia 6(8): 56-60.

J

Jordan, G. B. and J. Mortensen (1997). "Measuring the performance of research and technology programs: a balanced scorecard approach." Journal of Technology Transfer 22(2).

Julian, D. (1997). "The utilization of the logic model as a system level planning and evaluaiton device." Evaluation and Program Planning 20(3): 251-257.

Julian, D. A., A. Jones, et al. (1995). "Open systems evaluation and the logic model: program planning and evaluation tools." Evaluation and Program Planning 18: 333-341.

L

Lenne, B. (1987). Describing program logic. Program Evaluation Bulletin. Sydney, Australia, New South Wales Public Service Board. 2.

Love, A. J., Ed. (1995). Evaluation methods sourcebook II. Ottawa, Canadian Evaluation Society.

M

Mabry, L. and S. Baik (1998). Ideological and structural logic models. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Macro International Inc (1995). Introduction to program evaluation for OPPE planning and evaluation contacts and staff. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Macro International, I. (1995). Introduction to program evaluation for OPPE planning and evaluation contacts and staff. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Martin, L., and Kettner, P.M. Measuring the Performance of Human Service Programs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1996. Order from 805/499-0721 or www. sagepubl.com.

Masters in Not-for-Profit Leadership: http://www.mnpl.org/

Mattessich, P. and B. Monsey (1998). Stating outcomes for American Cancer Society programs: a handbook for volunteers and staff. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society.

Mayeske, G. W. (1994). Life cycle program management and evaluation: an heuristic approach. Washington, DC, USDA.

McEwan, K. L. and D. A. Bigelow (1997). "Using a logic model to focus health services on population health goals." Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 12(1): 167-174.

McLaughlin, J. A. and J. B. Jordan (1999). "Logic models: a tool for telling your program's performance story." Evaluation and Program Planning 22(1): 65-72.

Milligan, S., C. Coulton, et al. (1996). Implementing a theories of change evaluation in Cleveland Community Building Initiative. Cleveland, OH, Center on Urban Poverty and Social Change.•Logic Model Bibliography — Page 4 Montague, S. (1997). "Evaluators and performance measurement: bringing the logic model to the manager." Canadian Evaluation Society Newsletter 17(12): 1-2.

Milligan, S., C. Coulton, et al. (1996). Implementing a theories of change evaluation in Cleveland Community Building Initiative. Cleveland, OH, Center on Urban Poverty and Social Change.oLogic Model Bibliography — Page 4 Montague, S. (1997). "Evaluators and performance measurement: bringing the logic model to the manager." Canadian Evaluation Society Newsletter 17(12): 1-2.

Moyer, A., H. Verhovsek, et al. (1997). "Facilitating the shift to population-based public health programs: innovation through the use of framework and logic model tools." Canadian Journal of Public Health 88(2): 95-98.

O

Outcome Based Evaluation -- Participant Packet Page 11 © Seattle University, Executive Master in Not-for-Profit Leadership Program, 2000 Evaluation Forum. How to Succeed at Outcome-based Evaluation, Parts I & II. Seattle, WA: 1997. Order from (206)269-0171.

P

Peterson, J. L., J. J. Card, et al. (1994). "Evaluating teenage pregnancy prevention and other social programs: ten stages of program assessment." Family Planning Perspectives 26(3): 116- 131.

Piontek, M. and C. Osburn (1998). Conceptualizing cluster evaluation: using teleconferences and focus groups to evaluate a community-based leadership cluster. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Piontek, M. E. and C. Osburn (1998). Conceptualizing cluster evaluation: using teleconferences and focus groups to evaluate a community-based leadership cluster. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Poreteous, N. L., B. J. Sheldrick, et al. (1997). Program evaluation tool kit: a blueprint for public health management. Ottawa, Canada, Public Health Research, Education, and Development Program, Ottawa-Carleton Health Department.

Practical Concepts Incorporated (1971). The logical framework: approach and training materials developed for the US Agency for International Development. Washington, DC.

R

Reisman, J., Smart, D.H., and Clegg, J. Outcomes for Success 2000! Seattle, WA: Organizational Research Services and Clegg and Associates, 1999. Order from 206/269-0171.

Rogers, P. (1998). Alternative causal models in program theory evaluation and monitoring.

Rogers, P. J. (1998). Alternative causal models in program theory evaluation and monitoring.

Rugg, D., J. Buehler, et al. (1999). "Evaluating HIV prevention: a framework for national, state, and local levels." American Journal of Evaluation 20(1): 35-56.

Rush, B. and A. Ogbourne (1991). "Program logic models: expanding their role and structure for program planning and evaluation." Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 6: 95-106.

S

Sartorius, R. (1991). "The logical framework approach to project design and management." Evaluation Practice 12(2): 139-47.

Sartorius, R. (1996). "The thrird generation logical framework." Eurpoean Journal of Agricultural Extension(March).

Sartorius, R. (1998). Participatory monitoring and evaluation systems: improving program performance while building capacity of partner institutions. American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Sartourius, R. (1991). "The logical framework approach to project design and management." Evaluation Practice 12(2): 139-47.

Seatlle, WA, United Way of King County.

Smith, M. (1989). Evaluability assessment: a practical approach. Boston, Kluwer Academic.•Logic Model Bibliography — Page 5 Solem, R. R. (1987). The logical framework approach to project design, review, and evaluation in AID: genesis, impact problems, and opportunities. Washington, DC, USAID: Center for Development Information and Evaluation.

Smith, M. (1989). Evaluability assessment: a practical approach. Boston, Kluwer Academic.oLogic Model Bibliography — Page 5 Solem, R. R. (1987). The logical framework approach to project design, review, and evaluation in AID: genesis, impact problems, and opportunities. Washington, DC, USAID: Center for Development Information and Evaluation.

Speigel, R.A. Accountable Good: Program Evaluation in the Nonprofit Sector. Washington DC: The Advisory Board Foundation, 1999. Order from 202/672-5865.

Stufflebeam, D. and A. Shinkfield (1985). Systematic Evaluation. Hingham, MA, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Stufflebeam, D. L. and A. J. Shinkfield (1985). Systematic Evaluation. Hingham, MA, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

T

Tabori, J. and J. Hermann (1997). Logic models: a brief introduction. Sociological Practice Association Annual Meeting, Scottsdale, AZ.

Tabori, J. R. and J. A. Hermann (1997). Logic models: a brief introduction. Sociological Practice Association Annual Meeting, Scottsdale, AZ.

Taylor-Powell, E., B. Rossing, et al. (1998). Evaluating collaboratiaves: reaching the potential. Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension.

The Evaluation Forum (1998). A guide to culturally appropriate outcome measurement. Seatlle, WA, United Way of King County.

The Health Communication Unit (1997). Evaluating health promotion programs. Toronto, Ontario, The Center for Health Promotion, University of Toronto.

Torvatn, H. (1999). "Using program theory models in evaluation of industrial modernization programs: three case studies." Evaluation and Program Planning 22(1): 73-82.

U

United Way of America (1996). Measuring program outcomes: a practical approach. Alexandria, VA, United Way of America.

United Way of America, outcome measurement and related resources: http://www.unitedway.org/outcomes/library

United Way of Greater Milwaukee. Lessons Learned III: Using Outcome Data. Milwaukee, WI: Author, 1988. Order from 414/263-8123.

University of Wisconsin Extension Program, Development and Evaluation Unit: http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluat.html

W

W.K. Kellogg Foundation (1998). Leaders against family violence: a fictionalized account of a W.K. Kellogg Foundation-sponsored cluster evaluation. Battle Creek, MI, W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

W.K. Kellogg Foundation (1998). The W.K. Foundation Evaluation Handbook. Battle Creek, MI, W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

Weiss, C. (1995). Nothing as practical as a good theory: exploring theory-based evaluaiton for comprehensive community initiatives for families and children. New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatiaves. J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr and C. H. Weiss. New York, NY, Aspin Institute.

Weiss, C. (1997). "How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway?" Evaluation Review 21(4): 501-524.

Weiss, C. H. (1995). Nothing as practical as a good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for families and children. New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives. J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr and C. H.

Weiss, C. H. (1997). "How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway?" Evaluation Review 21(4): 501-524.

Weiss, C. H. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: past, present, and future. Progress and Future Directions in Evaluation: Perspectives on Theory, Practice, and Methods. D. Rog and D. Fournier. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass. 76.

Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.•Logic Model Bibliography — Page 6 Wholey, J. S. (1979). Evaluation: promise and performance. Washington, DC, Urban Institute.

Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.oLogic Model Bibliography — Page 6 Wholey, J. S. (1979). Evaluation: promise and performance. Washington, DC, Urban Institute.

Weiss. New York, NY, Aspin Institute.

Wholey, J. S. (1983). Evaluation and effective public management. Boston, MA, Little Brown.

Wholey, J. S. (1987). Evaluability assessment: developing program theory. Using Program Theory in Evaluation. L. Bickman. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass. 33.

Wholey, J. (1979). Evaluation: promise and performance. Washington, DC, Urban Institute.

Wholey, J.S., Hatry, H.P. & Newcomer, K.E. (eds.). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1994. Order from 800/956-7739 or www.

Wilson, I. and P. Cleary (1995). "Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life." JAMA 273(1): 59-65.

Wilson, I. B. and P. D. Cleary (1995). "Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life." JAMA 273(1): 59-65.

Wong-Reiger, D. and L. David (1995). Using program logic models to plan and evaluate education and prevention programs. Evaluation Methods Sourcebook II. A. J. Love. Ottawa, Ontario, Canadian Evaluation Society.

Wong-Rieger, D. and L. David (1996). A hands-on guide to planning and evaluation. Ottawa, Canadian Hemophilia Society.